on to dismiss the latest complaint was fully briefed as of January 6, 2026, and is pending with the court. MII intends to defend vigorously against plaintiffs’ claims. 2. Segal v. Amadeus IT Group, S.
St. Regis Residences
Real estateSoftware purchasing at St. Regis Residences is not directed by a centralized mandate, as the 2026 FDD names no mandated technology systems or designated procurement channels. The addressable market is small at 10 total franchised units, all single-unit operators, with no company-owned locations on file. Vendors should expect to sell directly to individual franchisees rather than a headquarters-level buyer.
Live signals
Ongoing fee load
What the operator pays every month
The recurring percentage of gross sales named in this filing. It is a floor, not a total — the filing discloses one of the two headline fees.
6%+of gross sales (FY2026)
15% reference
Mandated & recommended tech
The systems vendors compete with
Recommended systems named in Item 11 of the filing, no system-wide mandate locks the door.
nc., Case No. 2:24-cv-00229, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. On February 20, 2024, plaintiffs filed this putative class action lawsuit against CoSTAR and numerous
and others. The lawsuit alleges the unlawful sharing of information in violation of U.S. antitrust laws, focusing on the use 3976711 St. Regis Residences 2026 FDD (MIF, LLC) 17 of STR reports at luxur
rry Group plc. since October 2019, and Procter & Gamble since August 2020. She previously served as a director of AT&T Inc. until April 2022, WGL Holdings, Inc. from 1999 to 2018, Twitter, Inc. from M
The vendor opportunity at St. Regis Residences
St. Regis Residences presents a compact, single-unit operator market for software vendors. The 2026 Franchise Disclosure Document reports 10 total units, all franchised, with no company-owned locations on file. The brand operates in five states—Florida (3 units), New York (2), Illinois (1), Colorado (1), and Texas (1)—with nine mapped operators, none of whom are multi-unit owners. Year-over-year unit growth declined by 16.667%, signaling a contracting footprint rather than an expanding one. For a vendor, the total addressable market is these 10 locations, each likely making independent software decisions given the absence of any franchisor-level technology mandates.
Average unit volume (AUV) is not disclosed in the 2026 FDD, so vendors cannot benchmark revenue-based affordability. The royalty rate stands at 6.0% of gross revenues, and the initial franchise term is 5 years. These figures suggest a standard economic structure, but the lack of AUV data means vendors must qualify each prospect individually. The real estate focus of the brand—luxury residential properties under the St. Regis flag—implies a need for property management, CRM, and high-touch guest experience platforms, though no such systems are named in the disclosure.
Who controls software purchasing
The 2026 FDD lists five executives in Item 1: David S. Marriott (Chairman of the Board), Anthony Capuano (Director, Chief Executive Officer, and President), Isabella D. Goren (Director), Deborah Marriott Harrison (Director), and Frederick A. Henderson (Director). None hold titles related to technology, procurement, or operations that would indicate a centralized software buying center. The absence of a CIO, CTO, or VP of IT suggests that technology decisions are not made at the headquarters level.
With no parent company on file and an all-franchised unit base composed entirely of single-unit operators, the decision-maker level is best characterized as multi-unit operator (MUO)—in this case, individual franchisees. Vendors should target the owners of each of the nine mapped operator entities directly. There is no indication of a franchisee advisory council or technology committee that might influence purchasing collectively.
Mandated and current tech stack
The 2026 FDD contains no mandated or recommended technology systems. No POS provider, property management system, booking engine, CRM, or back-office platform is named in the disclosure. This is a blank-slate environment from a compliance standpoint: franchisees are not required to adopt any specific software, nor are they steered toward preferred vendors through Item 11 or related exhibits.
For a vendor, this means the sales process is purely competitive. You are not displacing an incumbent mandated by the franchisor, but you also lack the leverage of a headquarters endorsement. Each franchisee evaluates solutions independently, likely based on their specific property’s needs, existing vendor relationships, and budget. The luxury residential segment may already use high-end property management tools common in the Marriott ecosystem, but the FDD does not confirm this.
Procurement, renewals, and timing
Item 8 of the 2026 FDD provides no extract regarding procurement. There is no designated supplier list, no approved vendor program, and no purchasing cooperative disclosed. This open procurement model means vendors can engage franchisees at any time without navigating a franchisor-mandated approval process.
Item 17, which typically covers renewal, termination, and transfer terms, also contains no extract. Without renewal-cycle data, vendors cannot predict when existing software contracts might come up for rebid. The 5-year initial term and the recent unit contraction suggest that new-unit openings—often a trigger for software adoption—are unlikely in the near term. Vendors should focus on the existing 10 units and monitor any change in unit count or franchisor leadership that might signal a shift toward centralized technology management.
How to read the St. Regis Residences FDD
The 2026 FDD is the primary source for understanding the franchise system’s structure, obligations, and constraints. Key sections for software vendors include Item 1 (executive team and brand history), Item 8 (procurement restrictions), Item 11 (franchisor assistance and mandated technology), and Item 17 (renewal and transfer terms). In this FDD, many of these sections are sparse or contain no extract, which itself is a data point: it indicates a lightly regulated franchise environment with minimal franchisor involvement in operations.
Review the embedded PDF below to verify the figures cited here and to search for any supplemental exhibits that may reference technology or preferred vendors not captured in the standard items. For a ranked target list of franchise systems aligned with your software category, FranCloud can help you prioritize based on unit counts, decision-maker concentration, and tech mandates.
Questions vendors ask
St. Regis Residences, answered from the filing
Read the filing itself
Every number on this page traces back to this document. Read it in full, page by page. Buy the original PDF to download, search, and annotate it.
View only A one-time purchase: the original filing, yours to keep.
FDD alert
Tell me when this brand refiles.
We’ll email you the moment St. Regis Residences files a new annual FDD, usually the freshest signal of a vendor change.
Operator footprint
Who runs the locations
9 operators run 9 mapped locations. 0 of them are multi-unit. Aggregate counts from the filing; no names.
Operators by units owned
Top states by locations
| FL | 3 |
|---|---|
| NY | 2 |
| IL | 1 |
| CO | 1 |
| TX | 1 |
Ownership
The portfolio behind St. Regis Residences
strategic_multibrand of Marriott.
Sibling brands
Related Real estate brands
Primary franchise filings · updated June 2026. Every figure is source-traceable and QA-checked.