y any other form of written communication of our approval or disapproval. You must not conduct any advertising without our written permission, in any Social Media such as Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn,
Knights of the Razor
Personal servicesSoftware purchasing at Knights of the Razor is controlled at the HQ level by Founder and President/CEO Damian Johnson and Vice President/COO Jermaine Johnson. The most recent FDD (2025) does not disclose any mandated or recommended technology systems. With 12 total units—6 franchised and 6 company-owned—the addressable market is small but concentrated, and the 7-year initial term with a renewal window creates a predictable sales cycle for vendors targeting this personal-services franchise.
Live signals
Ongoing fee load
What the operator pays every month
The recurring percentage of gross sales named in this filing, before rent, labour or any technology fee.
7%of gross sales (FY2025)
15% reference
Mandated & recommended tech
The systems vendors compete with
5 of these are mandated in the franchise agreement. Each is named in Item 11 of the filing, the incumbents a challenger must displace or integrate with.
r form of written communication of our approval or disapproval. You must not conduct any advertising without our written permission, in any Social Media such as Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Pinterest,
written communication of our approval or disapproval. You must not conduct any advertising without our written permission, in any Social Media such as Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Yelp and
mail or by any other form of written communication of our approval or disapproval. You must not conduct any advertising without our written permission, in any Social Media such as Twitter, Facebook, L
munication of our approval or disapproval. You must not conduct any advertising without our written permission, in any Social Media such as Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Yelp and others. You
Who buys here
The buyer at this brand
The decision-maker a vendor sells to at this scale, and the gaps they’re paid to close, derived from our data by segment and unit count, not a guess.
The franchisee/operator personally, or a small franchisor still owner-run. Wears every hat.
- With 298 active personal services brands, I can't see which ones are growing or have the tech gaps my product fills, so I waste weeks chasing the wrong targets.A rep burning 10 hours/week on manual research at $50/hr loses $26,000/year. FranCloud's fit_scoring and corpus_search surface high-fit brands in seconds, reclaiming that time for selling.
- 68.6% of brands mandate no accounting system, meaning 93 brands are ripe for displacement, but I lack the unit-count and financial context to prioritize them.Focusing on the wrong 10 brands costs a rep 2+ deals per quarter. FranCloud's fit_scoring layers AUV and unit growth onto tech gaps, so reps chase only the 93 with real revenue potential.
- Even when I know which brands to target, I can't get reliable decision-maker contacts for the 277 brands with disclosed unit counts.SDRs spend 5+ hours/week hunting contacts. FranCloud's contact_enrichment delivers verified contacts in-line, saving 260 hours/year per rep and adding 15% more meetings.
The vendor opportunity at Knights of the Razor
Knights of the Razor is a personal-services franchise based in North Carolina with a total footprint of 12 units—6 franchised and 6 company-owned. The system contracted by 14.3% year-over-year, which means the addressable market for software vendors is both small and potentially consolidating. For a SaaS vendor, this is not a volume play; it is a targeted, relationship-driven sale where every unit counts. The franchise charges a 6.0% royalty and operates on a 7-year initial term, with renewal terms also set at 7 years. No average unit volume (AUV) is disclosed in the 2025 FDD, so vendors cannot benchmark potential ROI against unit-level revenue. The absence of a parent company suggests independent ownership, which often means faster decision cycles at HQ—but also fewer layers of procurement bureaucracy to navigate.
Who controls software purchasing
Software purchasing authority sits at the top of the organization. The 2025 FDD lists Damian Johnson as Founder and President/CEO and Jermaine Johnson as Vice President/COO. These two individuals are the most likely final decision-makers for any enterprise-level software investment. Supporting them are Kurt Ross, Director of Operations, and Charlie Petty, Director of Training. In a system this small, the buying center is compact: the CEO and COO likely approve budget, while the Director of Operations may evaluate tools that affect daily workflows and the Director of Training may weigh in on platforms that impact onboarding or compliance. Vendors should prepare to engage directly with the C-suite rather than a dedicated IT or procurement department, which is not listed in the FDD.
Mandated and current tech stack
The 2025 FDD does not disclose any mandated or recommended technology systems. There is no named POS vendor, no required operational software, and no specified hardware or digital infrastructure. This is a blank-slate scenario for software vendors. It also means that the current tech stack is unknown to outside parties unless discovered through direct outreach. For a vendor, the absence of a mandate is both an opportunity and a challenge: you can position your solution as a first-mover standard, but you will need to invest in educating the leadership team on why a formal tech stack matters for a franchise system—even one of this size.
Procurement, renewals, and timing
Item 8 of the FDD, which typically outlines procurement restrictions and designated suppliers, was not captured in our corpus. This means the procurement model—whether designated supplier, approved supplier, or open market—is not publicly known. Vendors should assume an open or informal model until told otherwise. The renewal structure, drawn from Item 17, provides a clear timing signal: franchisees must provide written notice of intent to renew, be in full compliance, sign the then-current form of agreement (which may have materially different terms), execute a general release, upgrade the business to then-current standards, and pay a renewal fee. The 7-year term means that, barring early exits, each franchise agreement has a predictable endpoint. For a vendor, this creates a natural conversation about technology upgrades tied to renewal cycles—especially since the renewal clause explicitly requires upgrading to current standards.
How to read the Knights of the Razor FDD
The 2025 Franchise Disclosure Document is the primary source for the facts on this page. It was filed with state franchise regulators and is available in full through the embedded viewer below. When reading the FDD, pay closest attention to Item 1 (the executives listed above), Item 8 (procurement restrictions, though absent here), Item 11 (franchisor assistance, where tech mandates would typically appear), and Item 17 (renewal and termination). Because no tech systems are mandated, Item 11 is notably sparse for vendor research purposes. The unit count and ownership structure confirm this is a small, independently owned system where personal relationships with HQ will matter more than formal RFP processes. For a ranked target list of franchise systems that match your software category, FranCloud can help you prioritize based on real FDD data.
Questions vendors ask
Knights of the Razor, answered from the filing
Read the filing itself
Every number on this page traces back to this document. Read it in full, page by page. Buy the original PDF to download, search, and annotate it.
View only A one-time purchase: the original filing, yours to keep.
FDD alert
Tell me when this brand refiles.
We’ll email you the moment Knights of the Razor files a new annual FDD, usually the freshest signal of a vendor change.
Operator footprint
Who runs the locations
5 operators run 5 mapped locations. 0 of them are multi-unit. Aggregate counts from the filing; no names.
Operators by units owned
Top states by locations
| NC | 3 |
|---|---|
| MD | 1 |
| SC | 1 |
Related Personal services brands
Primary franchise filings · updated June 2026. Every figure is source-traceable and QA-checked.