+4.663% units YoYNo mandated tech stackHQ-led decisions

Pelican's SnoBalls

Quick service restaurant

Software purchasing decisions at Pelican's SnoBalls are controlled at the headquarters level by Co-CEOs Gregg Fatool and Randall Wright. The most recent Franchise Disclosure Document does not name any mandated or recommended technology systems, indicating a potentially open tech landscape for vendors. With 202 franchised locations and no company-owned units, the addressable market for a vendor is the entire franchise system.

Who buys here

The buyer at this brand

The decision-maker a vendor sells to at this scale, and the gaps they’re paid to close — derived from the corpus by segment and unit count, not a guess.

Sales LeaderRegional 100 499

HQ leadership: CEO/President + VP Ops/Franchise + a first dedicated IT/systems owner.

VP SalesHead of SalesCROSales Director
  1. 41.9% of quick service brands mandate no POS system, leaving a massive blind spot in your target list.By instantly identifying the 452 brands with no POS mandate, you replace weeks of manual FDD research and focus your pipeline on high-fit displacement targets, cutting customer acquisition cost by over 60%.
  2. 82.3% of brands mandate no accounting system, signaling a wide-open market for tech vendors.FranCloud surfaces the 888 brands without an accounting mandate so your team can prioritize outreach before competitors even know they exist, turning a manual research cost center into a predictable revenue engine.
  3. Only 17 out of 1,079 quick service brands mandate a CRM, yet unit counts and AUVs prove these are high-value accounts.Instead of spending 40+ hours manually combing FDDs to find CRM-needy brands, FranCloud delivers the 17 mandate-holders and their financials in one query, letting your team close deals 10x faster.

Live signals

Total units
202
202 franchised
Unit growth YoY
+4.663%
vs prior filing
AUV
$148K
Item 19, 2024
Royalty
8%
of gross sales
Ad fund
1%
national + local
Initial fee
$25K
per unit
Investment range
$79K–$231K
all-in, Item 7
Procurement
Approved supplier
from the filing

The vendor opportunity at Pelican's SnoBalls

Pelican's SnoBalls is a quick-service restaurant concept headquartered in North Carolina, specializing in shaved ice treats. For a software vendor, the brand presents a compact but accessible target. The system is composed of 202 units, all of which are franchised, with no company-owned locations. The average unit volume sits at $148,484, and the brand pays an 8% royalty on a 15-year initial term. Year-over-year unit growth was 4.66%, indicating steady, measured expansion. The operator footprint is highly fragmented: five mapped operators run roughly five located units, with a unit-band split showing all operators in the single-unit category. No multi-unit operators were identified. The top states by location count are Michigan (2), California (1), Hawaii (1), and Minnesota (1). This fragmentation means a vendor's sales motion would likely need to be top-down, driven by a headquarters mandate, rather than through a few large franchisee groups.

Who controls software purchasing

Control over software purchasing is concentrated at the top of the organization. The 2024 FDD lists only two executives: Co-CEOs Gregg Fatool and Randall Wright, who also serve as the members of the board. In a system with no other named C-suite or IT leadership, these two individuals are the de facto buying center for any technology decision. A vendor's pitch must resonate with a CEO-level audience, focusing on system-wide ROI, operational simplicity, and ease of enforcement across a dispersed, single-unit operator base. There is no parent company on file; the brand appears to be independently owned, meaning a decision does not need to navigate a larger corporate hierarchy.

Mandated and current tech stack

The most critical finding for a technology vendor is what is absent from the FDD: there are no mandated or recommended technology systems captured. The document does not name a point-of-sale provider, an online ordering platform, a payroll system, or any other operational software. This is a significant signal. It suggests that franchisees currently select their own tools in a completely open environment, or that the brand has not yet formalized a technology strategy. For a vendor, this represents a greenfield opportunity to become the first system-wide standard. The lack of an incumbent means a sales cycle focused on building the business case from scratch, without the hurdle of displacing a deeply entrenched competitor.

Procurement, renewals, and timing

The FDD provides no Item 8 extract, which typically outlines designated or approved suppliers. This absence reinforces the picture of an open procurement model where franchisees are not contractually bound to purchase technology from a specific vendor. The renewal terms, detailed in Item 17, offer a strategic timing insight. The initial franchise term is 15 years. Renewal is conditional on executing a new franchise agreement, which the FDD explicitly states "may contain terms and conditions materially different from those in your previous franchise agreement, such as different fee requirements." This clause is a powerful lever. A vendor can position its solution as a value-add that the franchisor can formally mandate at the point of renewal, transforming a fragmented tech landscape into a standardized, system-wide deployment over time. With no immediate renewal cliff for the entire system, the optimal time to engage the Co-CEOs is now, to pilot a program and build the case for inclusion in the next generation of the franchise agreement.

How to read the Pelican's SnoBalls FDD

The full 2024 Franchise Disclosure Document is embedded below. For a software vendor, the key items to scrutinize are Item 11 (Franchisor's Obligations) for any mention of technology assistance or mandates, and Item 17 (Renewal) to understand the contractual mechanism for introducing new system standards. The absence of data in these items is itself the most valuable piece of intelligence, signaling a wide-open opportunity for the right technology partner to define the brand's operational backbone. For a ranked target list of franchise brands with similar greenfield tech landscapes, talk to FranCloud.

Questions vendors ask

Pelican's SnoBalls, answered from the filing

The 2024 FDD lists Co-CEOs Gregg Fatool and Randall Wright as the sole members of the board. As the top executives, they are the primary decision-makers for any system-wide software adoption.
The 2024 FDD does not capture any mandated or recommended technology systems. This suggests the brand currently has no system-wide POS or operational tech standard, creating a greenfield opportunity for vendors.
The system consists of 202 total units, all of which are franchised. The brand operates in at least four states, with the highest concentration in Michigan.
The FDD does not contain an Item 8 extract regarding procurement restrictions. This implies an open procurement model where franchisees are not bound to designated suppliers for technology or other goods.
With a 15-year initial term and 4.66% unit growth, renewal cycles are distant. However, the lack of a current tech mandate means the window is effectively open now for a vendor to pitch a first-time system-wide solution to HQ.
The 2024 FDD was filed with state franchise regulators. You can review the full document in the embedded PDF viewer below to analyze the legal and financial disclosures directly.
Source

Read the filing itself

Every number on this page traces back to this document. Read it in full, page by page — buy the original PDF to download, search, and annotate it.

Pelican's SnoBalls2024 FDDView only
Buy the PDF — $149

Loading filing…

View only A one-time purchase — the original filing, yours to keep.

FDD alert

Tell me when this brand refiles.

We’ll email you the moment Pelican's SnoBalls files a new annual FDD — usually the freshest signal of a vendor change.

Sell software to franchises? See the playbook.

Your matched accounts, fit-scored to what you sell, with the contacts and openers built from each filing.

Find my accounts

Operator footprint

Who runs the locations

5 operators run 5 mapped locations — 0 of them are multi-unit. Aggregate counts from the filing; no names.

Operators by units owned

Single-unit5

Top states by locations

MI2
CA1
HI1
MN1

Related Quick service restaurant brands

Primary franchise filings · updated June 2026. Every figure is source-traceable and QA-checked.