Mathnasium Center Licensing

The vendor opportunity at Mathnasium

Mathnasium Center Licensing operates 972 total units in the US, of which 968 are franchised and 4 are company-owned. The brand is part of Mathnasium Holdings, LLC, and its franchisees are exclusively single-unit operators—915 mapped operators run 915 located units, with zero multi-unit franchisees reported in the 2024 FDD. For a software vendor, this structure means a single buying center at headquarters controls technology decisions for nearly 1,000 locations. There is no fragmented multi-unit owner layer to navigate; the path to adoption runs through the corporate office.

Year-over-year unit growth was 1.788%, and the top states by location count are California (171), Texas (93), Florida (62), Illinois (45), and Virginia (42). The royalty rate is 10.0%, and the initial franchise term is 5 years. Average unit volume is not disclosed in the most recent FDD.

Who controls software purchasing

The 2024 FDD lists five key executives in Item 1. Chief Technology Officer Jason Condello is the most direct buyer for software vendors. CEO Tyler Sgro and SVP of Franchise Operations Kristin Goedke are also likely involved in technology decisions that affect franchise operations. Chief Development Officer Kevin Shen and Chief Marketing Officer Michael Stanfield round out the leadership team but are less central to core software procurement.

Because the system is entirely single-unit franchisees with no multi-unit operators, franchisee influence on software selection is minimal. The franchisor mandates the tech stack, and franchisees comply. Your sales motion should target the HQ technology and operations leadership, not individual center owners.

Mandated and current tech stack

Mathnasium mandates two systems across its network: the Mathnasium Management System and the Mathnasium Operating System. Both are powered by Radius, which is the named vendor in the FDD. This is a closed, standardized environment. Any software vendor pitching Mathnasium must be prepared to integrate with or replace Radius, or to complement the existing stack in a way that does not conflict with the mandate.

The FDD does not list additional recommended or optional technology vendors. The absence of other named systems suggests the Radius platforms cover the core operational and management functions. Vendors offering adjacent capabilities—such as advanced analytics, scheduling optimization, or parent communication tools—may find a gap to fill, but must address the Radius integration question head-on.

Procurement, renewals, and timing

Item 8 of the 2024 FDD contains no extract regarding procurement requirements. This means the franchise disclosure does not publicly specify whether Mathnasium uses designated suppliers, approved supplier lists, or an open procurement model. In practice, the technology mandate signals a controlled environment where HQ makes the vendor decisions.

Franchise agreements run for 5 years, and Item 17 confirms that franchisees in good standing can execute successor agreements for additional 5-year terms. This renewal cadence, combined with modest unit growth, suggests that major technology evaluations may align with agreement cycles or system-wide upgrade initiatives. Vendors should monitor executive leadership changes and any public announcements about platform updates to time their outreach.

How to read the Mathnasium FDD

The 2024 Franchise Disclosure Document is the authoritative source for understanding Mathnasium’s technology requirements, fee structure, and leadership. The embedded PDF viewer below contains the full filing. Key sections for software vendors include Item 1 (executives), Item 11 (mandated systems), Item 8 (procurement restrictions), and Item 17 (renewal terms). Use these sections to validate the information above and to identify any updates in subsequent filing years. For a ranked target list of franchise brands aligned to your software category, FranCloud can help.