FDD Item 7: how to read the startup-cost table

Item 7 of a Franchise Disclosure Document is the table that estimates your total initial investment — every cost from the franchise fee through build-out, equipment, and opening inventory, plus roughly three months of additional funds. It is filed as a low–high range because real openings vary by site, format, and market.

8 min read · figures checked against the live filings, June 2026

What the table actually contains

Item 7 is a grid: one row per cost category, a low and a high estimate for each, the method of payment, when it falls due, and who receives the money. The first row is the initial franchise fee from Item 5. After that come the physical costs — leasehold improvements, equipment, signage, opening inventory — then the soft costs: training travel, insurance, licenses, professional fees. The final row, usually titled “additional funds,” is the franchisor’s estimate of the cash you will burn in the first three months or so of operation.

Two reading rules. First, the footnotes are not optional — they state which store format, which markets, and which landlord assumptions each column rests on. Second, the total row is the only number most people quote and the least useful one in the table; the spread between low and high in each row tells you where your project can blow out.

Why the range runs so wide

Take a real case. The 2026 filing for Jersey Mike’s Subs puts the total initial investment at $436K–$1.16M — the high end nearly triple the low. That is not sloppiness; it is honesty about formats. A conversion of an existing space in a cheap market sits near the bottom. A ground-up build with a drive-thru in an expensive market sits near the top. Both are the same franchise on paper and very different projects in cash.

The width of the range is itself a signal. A brand filing a tight range operates one repeatable format; a brand filing a wide one is telling you that your site decision, not the brand decision, drives most of your cost.

Worked example · three filings, side by side

Same aisle of the food court, three different bets

BrandItem 7 rangeInitial feeAUV (Item 19)
Jersey Mike’s Subs (2026)$436K–$1.16M$20K$1.37M
Tropical Smoothie Cafe (2026)$276K–$771K$35K$978K
Smoothie King (2026)$320K–$1.30M$30K$662K

Read the columns together, not apart. Smoothie King’s range tops out above Jersey Mike’s, but its disclosed average unit volume is roughly half. That does not make it a worse business — margins, formats, and operating models differ — but it does mean the investment-to-sales ratio deserves a hard look before you sign. Our comparison pages line these figures up for any two brands in the directory.

Where to find the table for any brand

You do not need to request a document to see a brand’s Item 7 figures. Every page in our directory shows the filed investment range next to the fee stack and the AUV from the same filing, with the filing year attached — and we refresh the figures on every new annual filing, so you are reading the current document rather than a stale summary.

What the low end really assumes

The low column is real but rare. It typically assumes a small or conversion space, a forgiving market, meaningful landlord contribution, and a build that hits no surprises. Budget from it and you are planning the best case. The discipline that keeps franchisees solvent is simple: qualify your financing against the high end, and treat anything you save against it as margin, not as found money.

What Item 7 leaves out

  • Working capital past the first months. The additional-funds row runs out long before most units reach break-even.
  • Your own salary. The table funds the unit, not your household, through the ramp.
  • Financing costs. Interest and loan fees on the money you borrow to cover the table are not in the table.
  • The recurring stack. The royalty, ad fund, and technology fees start the day you open — they live in Item 6, not Item 7.

Pressure-testing the table

The filing hands you its own audit tool: the Item 20 franchisee directory. Call operators who opened within the last two years — not the brand’s referral list — and ask the only two questions that matter: what did you actually spend, all in, and how many months until the unit covered its own costs? Then read the brand’s revenue claims against our guide to AUV, because a startup cost only makes sense relative to what a unit earns. Every brand page in the directory shows the filed range next to the filed AUV so you can do that math in one glance.

Common questions

Item 7, answered

Yes — the initial franchise fee from Item 5 is the first row of the Item 7 table. The rest of the rows are everything else: real estate, build-out, equipment, signage, opening inventory, insurance, and an additional-funds row for the first months of operation.
No. It is the franchisor's estimate of an expensive opening, not a ceiling. Real projects can and do exceed it — construction overruns, landlord delays, and slow ramps are not capped by the table. Treat the high end as your planning floor, not your worst case.
Only thinly. The additional-funds row typically covers about three months of operating shortfall. Most units take longer than three months to reach break-even, and the table does not include your own living expenses while the unit ramps.
Format and real estate. A brand with one small in-line format files a tight range; a brand spanning kiosks, end-caps, and freestanding drive-thru buildings files a wide one. The footnotes under the table say which formats and markets each column assumes.
Item 20 of the same filing lists current and former franchisees with contact details. Call several who opened in the last two years and ask their actual all-in cost against the filed range. Operators who lived the build-out are the best audit of the table.