VP Holdings vs 9Round
Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.
More open target
9Round
wins 4 of 12 vendor rows
9Round and VP Holdings are evenly matched on the signals we track from their filings. Verdict: too close to call on the filings alone — pick based on your category fit.
fitness
VP Holdings
fitness
9Round
Total units
1
142
Franchised units
0
141
Unit growth YoY
—
-29.146%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$1.28M
—
Royalty
6%
6%
Ad fund
2%
2%
Initial franchise fee
$60K
$20K
Investment range (low)
$293K
$160K
Investment range (high)
$688K
$390K
Procurement model
Franchisor controlled
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2025
2026
Filing freshness
DUE
CURRENT
Common questions
VP Holdings vs 9Round, answered
VP Holdings has 1 total units and 9Round has 142, so 9Round is the larger system.
Both charge a 6% royalty.
VP Holdings's initial franchise fee is $60K and 9Round's is $20K, so 9Round has the lower fee.
VP Holdings's initial investment runs $293K–$688K and 9Round's runs $160K–$390K, so VP Holdings requires the larger investment.
See this comparison scored to your product.
The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.