UXMA Franchising vs Tiny Chefs Franchising I

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
UXMA Franchising
wins 1 of 12 vendor rows

Tiny Chefs Franchising I and UXMA Franchising are evenly matched on the signals we track from their filings. Verdict: too close to call on the filings alone — pick based on your category fit.

youth_services
UXMA Franchising
youth_services
Tiny Chefs Franchising I
Total units
7
1
Franchised units
0
0
Unit growth YoY
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$1.11M
Royalty
5%
5%
Ad fund
2%
1%
Initial franchise fee
$20K
$40K
Investment range (low)
$101K
$82K
Investment range (high)
$208K
$128K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2023
2026
Filing freshness
DORMANT
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

UXMA Franchising vs Tiny Chefs Franchising I, answered

UXMA Franchising has 7 total units and Tiny Chefs Franchising I has 1, so UXMA Franchising is the larger system.
Both charge a 5% royalty.
UXMA Franchising's initial franchise fee is $20K and Tiny Chefs Franchising I's is $40K, so UXMA Franchising has the lower fee.
UXMA Franchising's initial investment runs $101K–$208K and Tiny Chefs Franchising I's runs $82K–$128K, so UXMA Franchising requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.