Trustegrity vs FranNet
Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.
FranNet is the stronger software-sales opportunity right now. It wins decisively on total addressable market: 58 franchised units versus Trustegrity’s 22 total (only 10 franchised). That 5.8x multiplier on immediately accessible doors is the single most important number here. FranNet also files a current 2026 FDD with full franchisee transparency, which matters operationally—we can reach every unit without the friction of corporate-owned locations or opaque legacy filings that make vendor onboarding a slog. The AUV of $291,700 is modest, but it’s consistent across a homogeneous, fully franchised base, giving us a clean, repeatable deployment motion with minimal variability across sites.
The tradeoff is budget versus TAM. Trustegrity fields a lower all-in investment range ($37.5K–$74.3K vs. $59.5K–$97.5K), which could mean leaner ops with less free cash for software, and that 66.7% unit growth looks impressive on paper—until you realize it’s growth off a tiny base of 10 franchised units. High growth from a small denominator doesn’t change the immediate opportunity size, and an overdue FDD filing signals either disorganization or reluctance to disclose updated numbers, both red flags for a vendor evaluating timing and compliance risk. FranNet’s larger, stable, fully franchised base means faster pipeline build and less friction per deal.
Verdict: FranNet wins on TAM, terrain uniformity, and timing freshness—sacrificing some budget headroom for a 5.8x larger, fully reachable franchise footprint that closes faster.
Common questions
Trustegrity vs FranNet, answered
See this comparison scored to your product.
The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.