The Brothers that just do Gutters vs 76 Fence

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
The Brothers that just do Gutters
wins 2 of 12 vendor rows

The Brothers that just do Gutters is the stronger opportunity right now, and it’s not close. The dimension that wins is TAM—101 total units versus 2 is a 50x larger installed base to sell into, with 100 franchised locations creating a repeatable, multi-owner sales motion. Even with -6.5% unit growth YoY, the sheer footprint means you can lose a few doors and still have a viable pipeline. 76 Fence’s $1.54M AUV looks attractive on paper, but with only one franchised unit, you’re betting the entire revenue opportunity on a single owner-operator who may not need or want to layer on new software. That’s not a market; it’s a pilot at best.

The meaningful tradeoff is budget quality versus addressable scale. 76 Fence operators run higher-revenue locations with a tighter investment band ($165K–$315K), which often correlates with more cash to spend on tech. But that advantage evaporates when you realize there’s only one buyer to sell to. The Brothers’ lower AUV is offset by a 6% royalty and a $49.5K franchise fee that signals a franchisor actively monetizing a system large enough to care about operational efficiency—exactly the kind of partner who mandates or subsidizes software across their network. Their franchisor-controlled procurement model also means one yes at the top can unlock dozens of units, a classic terrain advantage that 76 Fence can’t replicate.

Timing seals it. Both FDDs are current, so no stale-data risk, but The Brothers’ negative growth is actually a buying signal: a franchisor with shrinking unit count is under pressure to improve unit economics and retention, making them more receptive to software that drives revenue or cuts costs. You’re selling into a pain point, not a victory lap. 76 Fence is too early-stage to justify dedicated sales effort unless you’re willing to treat it as a loss-leader for a vertical you’re not yet in.

Verdict: The Brothers that just do Gutters wins on TAM, terrain, and timing—pursue them now, and revisit 76 Fence when they hit 20+ units.

home_services
The Brothers that just do Gutters
home_services
76 Fence
Total units
101
2
Franchised units
100
1
Unit growth YoY
-6.542%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$1.54M
Royalty
6%
8%
Ad fund
2%
1%
Initial franchise fee
$50K
$60K
Investment range (low)
$144K
$166K
Investment range (high)
$511K
$316K
Procurement model
Franchisor controlled
Franchisor controlled
FDD fiscal year
2025
2025
Filing freshness
CURRENT
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

The Brothers that just do Gutters vs 76 Fence, answered

The Brothers that just do Gutters has 101 total units and 76 Fence has 2, so The Brothers that just do Gutters is the larger system.
The Brothers that just do Gutters charges a 6% royalty and 76 Fence charges 8%, so The Brothers that just do Gutters has the lower royalty.
The Brothers that just do Gutters's initial franchise fee is $50K and 76 Fence's is $60K, so The Brothers that just do Gutters has the lower fee.
The Brothers that just do Gutters's initial investment runs $144K–$511K and 76 Fence's runs $166K–$316K, so The Brothers that just do Gutters requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.