Tempo by Hilton vs Atwell Suites
Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.
More open target
Atwell Suites
wins 3 of 12 vendor rows
Atwell Suites wins on terrain and timing—the two dimensions that matter most for a vendor selling into a nascent franchise system. The approved-supplier procurement model creates a near-captive account list once you’re on the spec: no bake-offs, no RFP gauntlets, just a compliance-driven sale. Tempo by Hilton’s standards-based approach forces you to compete on price and features for every single unit, which burns sales cycles and depresses win rates. A 33% year-over-year unit growth rate on a base of 8 means Atwell is in land-g
lodging
Tempo by Hilton
lodging
Atwell Suites
Total units
6
8
Franchised units
6
8
Unit growth YoY
—
33.333%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
—
—
Royalty
5%
—
Ad fund
—
—
Initial franchise fee
$100K
—
Investment range (low)
$25.52M
$16.87M
Investment range (high)
$37.85M
$25.26M
Procurement model
Standards based
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2026
2026
Filing freshness
CURRENT
CURRENT
Common questions
Tempo by Hilton vs Atwell Suites, answered
Tempo by Hilton has 6 total units and Atwell Suites has 8, so Atwell Suites is the larger system.
Tempo by Hilton's initial investment runs $25.52M–$37.85M and Atwell Suites's runs $16.87M–$25.26M, so Tempo by Hilton requires the larger investment.
See this comparison scored to your product.
The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.