Subway vs Crumbl Cookies

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
Subway
wins 2 of 12 vendor rows

Crumbl Cookies is the stronger software-sales opportunity right now, and it comes down to three dimensions where it win decisively: budget, timing, and terrain. The average unit revenue of $1.14M and an initial investment well north of $800k signal a franchisee with meaningful operating budget and a willingness to spend on tools that protect a high-volume business. That AUV dwarfs Subway’s typical unit economics (Subway’s FDD doesn’t even publish an AUV, but its low investment range of $263k–$631k implies much thinner margins per location). For a vendor, a single Crumbl store can justify a higher seat-based or transaction-based SaaS deal, and the growing footprint means the pool of well-capitalized buyers expands every quarter.

Timing and terrain tilt the field entirely toward Crumbl. The brand is adding units at 4% annually, which delivers a steady stream of greenfield openings — the easiest, fastest sales cycle for POS, scheduling, and marketing automation. Every new franchisee needs a tech stack from scratch. Subway, on the other hand, is shrinking by nearly 4% a year; you’re fishing in a pond that’s draining, fighting for replacement deals in a cost-cutting environment. The terrain knockout is procurement. Crumbl uses an approved-supplier model: franchisees can choose their own software from a vetted list, so you can sell directly to the operator without a corporate gatekeeper. Subway’s franchisor-controlled procurement means you cannot sell to a single store without first winning a corporate mandate, a long, political, multi-year enterprise sale that essentially locks out emerging vendors.

The one advantage Subway holds — total addressable market with 18,773 units — is a mirage when you factor in accessibility and growth trajectory. That massive unit count is a shrinking, locked-down install base that you can’t tap without a partnership you likely don’t have. The meaningful tradeoff is that you’re choosing a smaller-but-open, high-budget, expanding market over a giant-but-closed, low-budget, contracting one. The former closes deals; the latter burns sales capacity.

Verdict: Crumbl Cookies is the clear, actionable target; sell into its expanding franchisee base now while the procurement model remains open.

quick_service_restaurant
Subway
quick_service_restaurant
Crumbl Cookies
Total units
18,773
1,101
Franchised units
18,773
1,101
Unit growth YoY
-3.738%
4.064%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$1.14M
Royalty
8%
8%
Ad fund
4.5%
2%
Initial franchise fee
$15K
$50K
Investment range (low)
$264K
$849K
Investment range (high)
$632K
$1.47M
Procurement model
Franchisor controlled
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2026
2026
Filing freshness
CURRENT
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

Subway vs Crumbl Cookies, answered

Subway has 18,773 total units and Crumbl Cookies has 1,101, so Subway is the larger system.
Subway grew units -3.738% year over year vs +4.064% for Crumbl Cookies, so Crumbl Cookies is growing faster.
Both charge a 8% royalty.
Subway's initial franchise fee is $15K and Crumbl Cookies's is $50K, so Subway has the lower fee.
Subway's initial investment runs $264K–$632K and Crumbl Cookies's runs $849K–$1.47M, so Crumbl Cookies requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.