Restore Hyper Wellness vs ACASA Senior Care

ACASA Senior Care is the sharper, higher-probability target per deal. AUV sits at $6.9M—over 6x Restore’s $1M—which means each location runs real revenue density and can justify a premium POS, scheduling, and back-office stack without flinching. The investment range is also lean ($83K–$134K), so operators aren’t capital-starved after buildout; they have budget headroom for software that drives labor efficiency or client conversion. And the procurement model is approved-supplier, not franchisor-locked—your sales motion goes straight to the owner, not through a corporate gatekeeper who takes a margin cut or blocks the deal.

The tradeoff is TAM and timing. ACASA has only 7 franchised units and a 2025 FDD that’s already stale, so the total account pool is tiny and you’re betting on a growth curve that hasn’t yet proven it can scale. Restore gives you 200 franchised units, a current FDD, and a franchisor-controlled supply chain—which, if you can get in, turns into a walled-garden recurring stream. But Restore’s -4.8% unit contraction and $762K–$1.2M buildout cost mean operators are under serious cash stress; software spend gets deprioritized fast in that environment.

Verdict: ACASA wins on budget and buying authority per location, but only if you can close fast and ride the 40% growth wave before the FDD window closes.