Project Q by Hilton vs Staybridge Suites

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
Staybridge Suites
wins 4 of 12 vendor rows

Staybridge Suites wins on TAM and timing, and it’s not close. With 297 franchised units versus Project Q by Hilton’s two, you’re looking at a sales universe two orders of magnitude larger. That sheer unit count translates directly into more at-bats, faster pipeline build, and a real shot at landing reference accounts that feed organic expansion inside the brand. Combine that with a CURRENT FDD filing (2026 vs. 2025 DUE for Project Q) and 3.8% YoY unit growth, and you’ve got a moving target that’s actually growing its addressable base while you sell. Every net-new Staybridge opening is a greenfield software opportunity arriving on a predictable calendar.

Terrain tilts heavily toward Staybridge too. The approved-supplier procurement model gives you a clear path to becoming a recommended or mandated vendor, locking out competitors once you’re in. Project Q’s standards-based model leaves procurement fragmented—owners can source whatever meets spec, which erodes your ability to build beachheads and forces you to win every deal from scratch. Yes, Project Q’s ultra-low royalty and flagship-level investment bands signal owner sophistication and potentially fat per-unit ACV, but with only two franchisees, you’re betting the farm on a handful of whales who may already have deeply entrenched systems. That’s a budget play that starves you of scale. Staybridge gives you volume, velocity, and a procurement gate you can actually storm.

The meaningful tradeoff is deal size versus deal volume. Project Q might deliver a single six-figure ACV logo if you land a corporate mandate, but the odds are long and the market is microscopic. Staybridge puts you in a defendable procurement channel inside a 297-unit, growing system where average investment ranges from $21M to $31M per property—owners who can afford real software stacks. That’s the kind of ground where a dedicated outbound motion pays for itself within two quarters.

Verdict: Target Staybridge Suites for scale, procurement lock-in, and a live growth engine; Project Q is a trophy hunt with near-zero pipeline floor

lodging
Project Q by Hilton
lodging
Staybridge Suites
Total units
5
297
Franchised units
2
297
Unit growth YoY
3.846%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
Royalty
2%
Ad fund
Initial franchise fee
$50K
$500
Investment range (low)
$2.41M
$21.22M
Investment range (high)
$52.18M
$31.87M
Procurement model
Standards based
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2025
2026
Filing freshness
DUE
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

Project Q by Hilton vs Staybridge Suites, answered

Project Q by Hilton has 5 total units and Staybridge Suites has 297, so Staybridge Suites is the larger system.
Project Q by Hilton's initial franchise fee is $50K and Staybridge Suites's is $500, so Staybridge Suites has the lower fee.
Project Q by Hilton's initial investment runs $2.41M–$52.18M and Staybridge Suites's runs $21.22M–$31.87M, so Project Q by Hilton requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.