Oh Deer vs 76 Fence
Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.
Oh Deer is the clear pick, and it comes down to total addressable market and terrain. With 15 units (13 franchised) and 8.3% YoY unit growth, you’re looking at a real, expanding base of potential seats. 76 Fence’s two-unit system—one franchised location—is a rounding error. Even if that single franchisee buys every module you sell, the upside is capped. Oh Deer’s 13 franchised doors give you a repeatable sales motion and a chance to land a reference that unlocks the rest of the system. TAM wins here, and it’s not close.
The procurement model seals it. Oh Deer uses an approved-supplier approach, meaning franchisees have buying autonomy. You can sell directly to owners without fighting a corporate gatekeeper. 76 Fence’s franchisor-controlled procurement puts a hard wall between you and the unit-level buyer; you’d need to win a corporate mandate first, which is a long, low-probability cycle for a two-unit brand. Yes, 76 Fence’s AUV is 61% higher ($1.54M vs. $955K), so per-unit budget is fatter, but that budget is locked behind a closed door. Oh Deer’s open terrain lets you convert that lower AUV into volume, and volume compounds.
The tradeoff is real: you sacrifice per-deal size for deal count and
Common questions
Oh Deer vs 76 Fence, answered
See this comparison scored to your product.
The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.