HQ MRI vs ACASA Senior Care
Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.
More open target
HQ MRI
wins 2 of 12 vendor rows
ACASA Senior Care is adding units faster (40.0% vs -16.256% YoY), the stronger timing signal. ACASA Senior Care carries the lighter royalty load (5.0% vs 9.0%), leaving operators more room for software spend. Verdict: ACASA Senior Care is the stronger software-sales opportunity on today's filing data.
health_services
HQ MRI
health_services
ACASA Senior Care
Total units
170
8
Franchised units
170
7
Unit growth YoY
-16.256%
40%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
—
$6.90M
Royalty
9%
5%
Ad fund
0.5%
1%
Initial franchise fee
$40K
$50K
Investment range (low)
$44K
$83K
Investment range (high)
$96K
$134K
Procurement model
—
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2024
2025
Filing freshness
OVERDUE
DUE
Common questions
HQ MRI vs ACASA Senior Care, answered
HQ MRI has 170 total units and ACASA Senior Care has 8, so HQ MRI is the larger system.
HQ MRI grew units -16.256% year over year vs +40% for ACASA Senior Care, so ACASA Senior Care is growing faster.
HQ MRI charges a 9% royalty and ACASA Senior Care charges 5%, so ACASA Senior Care has the lower royalty.
HQ MRI's initial franchise fee is $40K and ACASA Senior Care's is $50K, so HQ MRI has the lower fee.
HQ MRI's initial investment runs $44K–$96K and ACASA Senior Care's runs $83K–$134K, so ACASA Senior Care requires the larger investment.
See this comparison scored to your product.
The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.