Homewood Suites by Hilton vs Papa Murphy's

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
Papa Murphy's
wins 3 of 12 vendor rows

Homewood Suites by Hilton wins on budget and timing, and that’s where the deal is for us right now. Each unit carries a minimum build cost north of $23 million—these aren’t franchisees pinching pennies on POS upgrades. When every property is franchised and expanding at 2.51% unit growth, each new hotel is a greenfield deployment ripe for a full-suite sale: scheduling, back-office, and guest-facing automation. The FDD is current, meaning no compliance fog, and the standards-based procurement forces owners into strict operational playbooks—our software becomes the tool they use to meet brand mandates. The royalty is a lean 3.5%, leaving margin on the table we can absorb into a tech stack upsell without franchisee pushback.

Papa Murphy’s wins on TAM and terrain—1,119 franchised doors is triple the footprint, and the approved-supplier model means we can slide in without a central mandate, selling direct to owners who already act autonomously on procurement. The AUV of $680K isn’t lush, but the $367K–$670K total investment band says these operators are small enough to feel acute pain from scheduling chaos and supply waste, making our value prop visceral. However, that 2.3% annual unit contraction is a flashing red light: we’d be selling into a shrinking base, spending cycles capturing wallet share as the fleet erodes. Compound that with a stale, overdue FDD, and we lose the predictable expansion pipeline that makes sustained demand gen work.

The tradeoff is trajectory over total doors. Homewood’s growth rate and per-unit budget dwarf Papa Murphy’s scale. We prioritize higher ACV, repeatable new-unit installs, and a brand actively opening properties over a larger but declining network where each sale is a one-shot rescue mission. Papa Murphy’s sheer unit count tempts volume, but declining units and low AUV make for a grinding, defensive sell. Homewood gives us a growth tailwind and the spending capacity to land multi-module, sticky deals.

Verdict: Homewood Suites by Hilton is the stronger opportunity—fewer units, far bigger checks, and a rising tide.

quick_service_restaurant
Homewood Suites by Hilton
quick_service_restaurant
Papa Murphy's
Total units
531
1,127
Franchised units
531
1,119
Unit growth YoY
2.51%
-2.271%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$681K
Royalty
3.5%
5%
Ad fund
2%
Initial franchise fee
$100K
Investment range (low)
$23.76M
$367K
Investment range (high)
$34.73M
$670K
Procurement model
Standards based
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2026
2024
Filing freshness
CURRENT
OVERDUE

Go deeper

Common questions

Homewood Suites by Hilton vs Papa Murphy's, answered

Homewood Suites by Hilton has 531 total units and Papa Murphy's has 1,127, so Papa Murphy's is the larger system.
Homewood Suites by Hilton grew units +2.51% year over year vs -2.271% for Papa Murphy's, so Homewood Suites by Hilton is growing faster.
Homewood Suites by Hilton charges a 3.5% royalty and Papa Murphy's charges 5%, so Homewood Suites by Hilton has the lower royalty.
Homewood Suites by Hilton's initial investment runs $23.76M–$34.73M and Papa Murphy's's runs $367K–$670K, so Homewood Suites by Hilton requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.