Dirty Dough Cookies vs Papa Murphy's

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
Papa Murphy's
wins 3 of 12 vendor rows

Dirty Dough’s 28% unit growth is the headline number that matters most for near-term software sales. A brand adding units at that clip creates a rolling pipeline of new franchisees who need POS, scheduling, and back-office tools now—before they’ve locked into a legacy system. That growth rate also signals a franchise system in expansion mode, where corporate is likely open to vendor partnerships that can scale with them. The tradeoff is brutal on TAM: 59 franchised units is a tiny install base, so you’re betting on future openings, not harvesting existing ones. But in quick-service, a fast-growing 69-unit chain often yields more software deals per quarter than a flat or shrinking giant where 90% of locations are already tooled up.

Papa Murphy’s wins on raw unit count and filing freshness, which usually signals a well-run franchisor with current tech needs. But negative unit growth and a stale 965-unit base mean the net-new-licensee pool is evaporating. The lower royalty and ad fund rates also suggest thinner corporate margins and less centralized tech mandate—franchisees may have more autonomy to cheap out on software. The higher investment range ($450K–$693K) implies operators are capital-constrained post-buildout, making them price-sensitive on SaaS. You’d be fighting for replacement deals in a contracting system, which is a grind.

Timing and terrain favor Dirty Dough. A young, high-growth brand with a $154K–$510K investment range attracts first-time franchisees who lack incumbent software relationships and need hand-holding on tech stack decisions. That’s your wedge. The overdue FDD is a yellow flag, not a dealbreaker—it often means the franchisor is overwhelmed by growth, which is exactly when they’ll outsource tech decisions to a trusted vendor. The smaller TAM is real, but you can capture disproportionate wallet share early and grow with the brand. Papa Murphy’s is a safer-looking spreadsheet pick that will underdeliver on closed deals.

Verdict: Dirty Dough Cookies wins on growth momentum and greenfield franchisee needs, despite a dangerously small current install base.

quick_service_restaurant
Dirty Dough Cookies
quick_service_restaurant
Papa Murphy's
Total units
69
1,014
Franchised units
59
965
Unit growth YoY
28.261%
-3.596%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
Royalty
6%
5%
Ad fund
4%
2%
Initial franchise fee
$35K
$25K
Investment range (low)
$154K
$450K
Investment range (high)
$510K
$693K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2024
2026
Filing freshness
OVERDUE
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

Dirty Dough Cookies vs Papa Murphy's, answered

Dirty Dough Cookies has 69 total units and Papa Murphy's has 1,014, so Papa Murphy's is the larger system.
Dirty Dough Cookies grew units +28.261% year over year vs -3.596% for Papa Murphy's, so Dirty Dough Cookies is growing faster.
Dirty Dough Cookies charges a 6% royalty and Papa Murphy's charges 5%, so Papa Murphy's has the lower royalty.
Dirty Dough Cookies's initial franchise fee is $35K and Papa Murphy's's is $25K, so Papa Murphy's has the lower fee.
Dirty Dough Cookies's initial investment runs $154K–$510K and Papa Murphy's's runs $450K–$693K, so Papa Murphy's requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.