Crave vs Papa Murphy's
Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.
Papa Murphy’s is the stronger software-sales opportunity right now, and it’s not close. The TAM dimension alone decides it: 1,014 total units versus 22. Even with a -3.6% unit decline, the absolute base of 965 franchised locations gives you a real pipeline. Crave’s 22-unit footprint means you’ll exhaust the entire addressable market after a handful of deals, and the -8.3% growth rate signals a brand contracting faster than you can sell into it. When you’re selling a multi-module platform—POS, marketing automation, scheduling, back-office—you need volume to justify the integration and support investment. Papa Murphy’s delivers that volume.
The tradeoff is budget pressure. Papa Murphy’s lower royalty rate (5% vs. 8%) and tighter investment band ($450K–$693K) suggest franchisees operate on thinner margins and may resist a premium software stack. Crave’s wide investment range topping $1M hints at operators with deeper pockets and more complex ops, but that’s a theoretical advantage you can’t monetize across only 22 units. Papa Murphy’s also has a fresher FDD (2026), which signals an active, current franchisor—better timing for a vendor trying to get in front of a system that’s still managing 1,000+ locations rather than a micro-brand in freefall.
Verdict: Papa Murphy’s wins on sheer TAM and timing, and the budget risk is manageable with a per-unit pricing model that fits the investment profile.
Common questions
Crave vs Papa Murphy's, answered
See this comparison scored to your product.
The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.