CR3 American Exteriors vs 76 Fence

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
CR3 American Exteriors
wins 0 of 12 vendor rows

Brand A is the stronger opportunity right now, and it’s not close. The decisive dimension is terrain: franchisor_controlled procurement. With only one franchised unit today, the total addressable market is laughably small, but that single decision-maker can mandate a software stack across all future locations. You’re not selling to a fragmented base of skeptical owners; you’re selling one deal to a franchisor who already controls purchasing. The $1.54M AUV and $165k–$315k investment range signal that operators have real budget for back-office and marketing automation, and an 8% royalty means the franchisor has recurring revenue to fund technology that improves unit economics. The tradeoff is obvious: you’re betting on a concept that hasn’t scaled yet. If they grow to 50 units, you’ve locked in a system-wide account from day one. If

home_services
CR3 American Exteriors
home_services
76 Fence
Total units
2
Franchised units
1
Unit growth YoY
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$1.54M
Royalty
8%
Ad fund
1%
Initial franchise fee
$60K
Investment range (low)
$166K
Investment range (high)
$316K
Procurement model
Franchisor controlled
FDD fiscal year
2025
2025
Filing freshness
CURRENT
CURRENT

Go deeper

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.