Concrete Craft vs 76 Fence

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
Concrete Craft
wins 3 of 12 vendor rows

76 Fence is the smarter target because budget and timing crush raw unit count here. A $1.54M AUV means each location (one franchised, one possibly corporate) runs a high-revenue operation that can justify meaningful software spend—POS, scheduling, back-office—without haggling over a few hundred a month. The FDD is current (2025), signaling an active, compliant franchisor that’s either just launching growth or carefully managing a young system. That freshness, combined with the high investment range, tells you the franchisee and franchisor have capital and operational sophistication. The franchisor-controlled procurement model is typically a barrier, but with a single franchisee, it collapses to a simple direct sale: win the franchisor’s approval once and you’ve captured the entire system. So terrain becomes an advantage, not a hurdle—it’s a single decision-maker with deep pockets.

Concrete Craft’s 77-unit TAM looks appealing until you inspect timing and terrain more honestly. Negative unit growth (-2.5% YoY) and an overdue FDD filing scream a system in trouble—franchisees may be exiting, franchisor support likely patchy, and regulatory risk hangs over every deal. The approved-supplier model does give franchisees autonomy, but that autonomy is only useful if franchisees are healthy and sticking around; shrinking units mean a dwindling addressable base and higher churn on any software you do sell. The $394K AUV is modest for home services, so budgets will be tight and cost-justification harder when operators are already under financial pressure. You’d spend sales cycles chasing a pool that’s leaking water.

The tradeoff is scale versus stability and spend-per-deal. 76 Fence offers a tiny but highly concentrated opportunity: one elite franchisee you can land with a focused, high-ticket sale, and a franchisor whose current filing suggests a growth trajectory you can ride upward. Concrete Craft offers breadth that’s collapsing, and the sales effort will likely yield lower ACV deals with higher risk of non-renewal. Right now, the capital efficiency of pursuing a single high-budget win with a clean compliance profile far outweighs spreading thin across a shaky network.

Verdict: 76 Fence is the stronger software-sales opportunity right now, because budget, timing, and a manageable procurement gate beat a deteriorating, overdue TAM.

home_services
Concrete Craft
home_services
76 Fence
Total units
77
2
Franchised units
77
1
Unit growth YoY
-2.532%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$394K
$1.54M
Royalty
7%
8%
Ad fund
1%
1%
Initial franchise fee
$20K
$60K
Investment range (low)
$156K
$166K
Investment range (high)
$233K
$316K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
Franchisor controlled
FDD fiscal year
2024
2025
Filing freshness
OVERDUE
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

Concrete Craft vs 76 Fence, answered

Concrete Craft has 77 total units and 76 Fence has 2, so Concrete Craft is the larger system.
Concrete Craft reports $394K in average unit revenue and 76 Fence reports $1.54M, so 76 Fence has the higher AUV.
Concrete Craft charges a 7% royalty and 76 Fence charges 8%, so Concrete Craft has the lower royalty.
Concrete Craft's initial franchise fee is $20K and 76 Fence's is $60K, so Concrete Craft has the lower fee.
Concrete Craft's initial investment runs $156K–$233K and 76 Fence's runs $166K–$316K, so 76 Fence requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.