Clintar vs 76 Fence

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
76 Fence
wins 3 of 12 vendor rows

76 Fence is the only viable target right now. TAM and timing decide it: two operating units and a current 2025 FDD mean there are actual doors to knock on and a franchisor actively recruiting more. Clintar’s zero total units and overdue 2023 FDD make it a ghost town—no matter how good the unit economics look on paper, there is no one to sell to. For a vendor, a small but real footprint beats a theoretical one every time.

The tradeoff is terrain and budget. Clintar’s approved-supplier model and $3.3M AUV would normally make it the richer, easier-sell environment, while 76 Fence’s franchisor-controlled procurement and lower $1.5M AUV create a narrower path. But with zero franchisees, those advantages are empty. Conversely, 76 Fence’s closed procurement is a lever: with only two units, the franchisor likely hasn’t locked in a long-term tech stack, so you can negotiate a preferred-vendor deal that rides system growth. The higher royalty (8% vs. 6%) also makes franchisees hungry for efficiency tools, sharpening your value prop.

The smart play is to own a small, growing system now rather than wait on a stalled brand. If Clintar ever revives its FDD and starts selling units, you can reevaluate—but today, there’s no opportunity worth the cycles.

Verdict: 76 Fence offers the only real software-sales opportunity right now, with active units and a current FDD outweighing Clintar’s hypothetical but empty advantages.

home_services
Clintar
home_services
76 Fence
Total units
0
2
Franchised units
0
1
Unit growth YoY
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$3.31M
$1.54M
Royalty
6%
8%
Ad fund
1%
1%
Initial franchise fee
$40K
$60K
Investment range (low)
$164K
$166K
Investment range (high)
$274K
$316K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
Franchisor controlled
FDD fiscal year
2023
2025
Filing freshness
OVERDUE
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

Clintar vs 76 Fence, answered

Clintar has 0 total units and 76 Fence has 2, so 76 Fence is the larger system.
Clintar reports $3.31M in average unit revenue and 76 Fence reports $1.54M, so Clintar has the higher AUV.
Clintar charges a 6% royalty and 76 Fence charges 8%, so Clintar has the lower royalty.
Clintar's initial franchise fee is $40K and 76 Fence's is $60K, so Clintar has the lower fee.
Clintar's initial investment runs $164K–$274K and 76 Fence's runs $166K–$316K, so 76 Fence requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.