Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar vs Papa Murphy's

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar
wins 2 of 12 vendor rows

Chili’s wins on budget and momentum, and that’s where the immediate software opportunity concentrates. The per-unit investment range of $4.0M–$6.4M signals operators with serious capital backing and a willingness to spend on infrastructure—POS, scheduling, and back-office systems aren’t afterthoughts in that buildout. With 2.06% unit growth and a fresh 2025 FDD, the brand is actively expanding, which means new-location software deals and rip-and-replace cycles at existing units chasing operational efficiency. The tradeoff is a thin franchised base of just 99 units, so the addressable franchise TAM is tiny; you’re essentially selling into a corporate-heavy footprint where a single enterprise deal could lock the whole chain, but losing it leaves almost no franchise fallback.

Papa Murphy’s dominates on terrain, with 965 franchised units forming a broad, fragmented field of independent owner-operators. That’s a textbook land-grab for a vendor that thrives on high-volume, smaller-deal sales motions. But the -3.6% unit contraction is a flashing red light: a shrinking footprint means fewer net-new installations and a customer base more focused on cost-cutting than technology investment. The lower investment range ($450K–$693K) also suggests operators with tighter margins who will scrutinize software ROI ruthlessly, making deal cycles longer and churn risk higher when times get tough.

The meaningful tradeoff is concentrated enterprise budget and growth at Chili’s versus distributed franchise volume in decline at Papa Murphy’s. Right now, a vendor that can navigate a corporate sales cycle should bet on Chili’s—the expansion tailwind and per-unit spending power create a richer, if narrower, pipeline. A vendor built purely for high-velocity SMB sales might still prefer Papa Murphy’s sheer unit count, but they’d be fighting headwinds in a contracting system.

Verdict: Chili’s is the stronger software-sales opportunity right now, driven by unit growth and per-location investment heft that outweigh its thin franchise count.

quick_service_restaurant
Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar
quick_service_restaurant
Papa Murphy's
Total units
1,208
1,014
Franchised units
99
965
Unit growth YoY
2.062%
-3.596%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
Royalty
1.25%
5%
Ad fund
4%
2%
Initial franchise fee
$60K
$25K
Investment range (low)
$3.96M
$450K
Investment range (high)
$6.35M
$693K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2025
2026
Filing freshness
CURRENT
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar vs Papa Murphy's, answered

Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar has 1,208 total units and Papa Murphy's has 1,014, so Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar is the larger system.
Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar grew units +2.062% year over year vs -3.596% for Papa Murphy's, so Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar is growing faster.
Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar charges a 1.25% royalty and Papa Murphy's charges 5%, so Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar has the lower royalty.
Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar's initial franchise fee is $60K and Papa Murphy's's is $25K, so Papa Murphy's has the lower fee.
Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar's initial investment runs $3.96M–$6.35M and Papa Murphy's's runs $450K–$693K, so Chili's and Chili's Grill & Bar requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.