Boost vs ACASA Senior Care

ACASA Senior Care dominates on budget and total addressable market. Its $6.9M average unit revenue is a concrete, high-end budget signal that Boost simply doesn’t match (no AUV disclosed), meaning each ACASA location can afford and justify a multi-module software stack—POS, marketing automation, scheduling—without the nickel-and-dime procurement battles common in smaller operations. With 7 franchised units growing 40% year-over-year against Boost’s 3 units shrinking -50%, the near-term pipeline of new doors and existing-location upsells is unambiguously weighted toward ACASA. Both brands use approved-supplier procurement, so the terrain isn’t wide open, but ACASA’s scale and growth give a vendor more at-bats to build a beachhead account and leverage a reference across the system.

The one meaningful trade-off is filing freshness. Boost’s FDD is current (2026), while ACASA’s is marked DUE—a stale filing that hints at administrative drag or a pause in formal franchise sales. Yet a 40% unit