BFT vs 9Round
Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.
More open target
9Round
wins 3 of 12 vendor rows
BFT is adding units faster (53.125% vs -29.146% YoY), the stronger timing signal. 9Round carries the lighter royalty load (6.0% vs 7.0%), leaving operators more room for software spend. Verdict: too close to call on the filings alone — pick based on your category fit.
fitness
BFT
fitness
9Round
Total units
49
142
Franchised units
49
141
Unit growth YoY
53.125%
-29.146%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$361K
—
Royalty
7%
6%
Ad fund
2%
2%
Initial franchise fee
$60K
$20K
Investment range (low)
$510K
$160K
Investment range (high)
$1.20M
$390K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2025
2026
Filing freshness
CURRENT
CURRENT
Common questions
BFT vs 9Round, answered
BFT has 49 total units and 9Round has 142, so 9Round is the larger system.
BFT grew units +53.125% year over year vs -29.146% for 9Round, so BFT is growing faster.
BFT charges a 7% royalty and 9Round charges 6%, so 9Round has the lower royalty.
BFT's initial franchise fee is $60K and 9Round's is $20K, so 9Round has the lower fee.
BFT's initial investment runs $510K–$1.20M and 9Round's runs $160K–$390K, so BFT requires the larger investment.
See this comparison scored to your product.
The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.