Babes in Business vs The Joint Chiropractic
Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.
The Joint Chiropractic is the stronger opportunity by a wide margin, and the dimension that seals it is TAM (total addressable market) paired with budget. With 800 franchised units, 12% unit growth, and a $615k AUV, this brand offers a large, expanding base of well-capitalized operators who can afford a full software stack. Babes in Business, with 3 franchised locations and zero growth, is a rounding error—there’s no pipeline, no scale, and the $23k investment ceiling signals operators who will churn on price or skip upgrades entirely. The Joint’s unit economics mean every location is a meaningful deal, and the sheer volume of units makes it worth building a dedicated sales motion.
The meaningful tradeoff is terrain: The Joint’s franchisor-controlled procurement model is a hard gate. You can’t just sell into the franchisee base; you need to win the franchisor first or navigate a tightly managed vendor list. That’s a longer, more political sale. However, the timing dimension tilts in your favor—the overdue FDD filing suggests a franchisor that may be distracted, under-resourced, or in transition, which often creates openings for a vendor that can solve a pressing operational
Common questions
Babes in Business vs The Joint Chiropractic, answered
See this comparison scored to your product.
The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.