Apostle Radon and Indoor Air Solutions vs 76 Fence

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
76 Fence
wins 4 of 12 vendor rows

76 Fence is the far stronger opportunity right now because it has the one thing Apostle Radon completely lacks: an actual software buyer. With one franchised unit generating $1.54M AUV, there’s a real, high-budget operator who can afford a multi-module stack (POS, marketing automation, scheduling, back-office) and has a clear incentive to adopt it. Apostle’s lone unit is corporate-owned with zero franchisees, so your TAM is exactly zero until that changes. The massive revenue gap means every seat you sell to 76 Fence’s franchisee will yield significantly higher contract value than anything Apostle could support—even if Apostle eventually adds units, their AUV caps spend at a third of the level.

Timing and terrain make the choice even sharper. 76 Fence filed a current 2025 FDD; they’re actively recruiting franchisees, which tells you the gatekeeper is motivated, accessible, and likely receptive to vendor partnerships that accelerate new unit openings. Apostle’s FDD is overdue by two years, signaling a stalled development pipeline. The procurement model tradeoff is real: 76 Fence’s franchisor-controlled supply chain means you must sell the parent company first, but that single deal unlocks every future location. Given their growth posture, that gatekeeper is a feature, not a bug—an engaged franchisor can mandate your solution across upcoming units, creating a compounding land-grab. Apostle’s approved-supplier model would be easier to enter if franchisees existed, but with none, it’s an open door to an empty room.

The meaningful tradeoff is concentrated influence versus immediate scale. You’re betting on one relationship with a high-AUV, actively expanding franchisor versus waiting for a dormant concept to maybe spin up franchisees who’d have fractionally smaller budgets. The gatekeeper risk at 76 Fence is acceptable because the reward is a franchisor who can lock you in just as their unit count grows from two to twenty. Sit on Apostle and you’ll be waiting indefinitely.

Verdict: Target 76 Fence—high revenue per unit, active franchise sales, and a single-point-of-influence procurement model that becomes a moat once you’re in.

home_services
Apostle Radon and Indoor Air Solutions
home_services
76 Fence
Total units
1
2
Franchised units
0
1
Unit growth YoY
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$435K
$1.54M
Royalty
8%
8%
Ad fund
2%
1%
Initial franchise fee
$43K
$60K
Investment range (low)
$120K
$166K
Investment range (high)
$201K
$316K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
Franchisor controlled
FDD fiscal year
2023
2025
Filing freshness
OVERDUE
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

Apostle Radon and Indoor Air Solutions vs 76 Fence, answered

Apostle Radon and Indoor Air Solutions has 1 total units and 76 Fence has 2, so 76 Fence is the larger system.
Apostle Radon and Indoor Air Solutions reports $435K in average unit revenue and 76 Fence reports $1.54M, so 76 Fence has the higher AUV.
Both charge a 8% royalty.
Apostle Radon and Indoor Air Solutions's initial franchise fee is $43K and 76 Fence's is $60K, so Apostle Radon and Indoor Air Solutions has the lower fee.
Apostle Radon and Indoor Air Solutions's initial investment runs $120K–$201K and 76 Fence's runs $166K–$316K, so 76 Fence requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.