Anago Franchising vs 76 Fence

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
Anago Franchising
wins 5 of 12 vendor rows

Anago Franchising is the obvious choice, and it’s not close. Total addressable market alone makes the decision: 44 franchised units versus a single franchisee at 76 Fence. Even if you closed 100% of 76 Fence’s franchise base, you’d have exactly one deal. Anago gives you 44 shots on goal, each with a unit doing over $3.4M in revenue—more than double 76 Fence’s AUV. That’s a bigger budget per location and a much larger aggregate wallet to chase. Timing also favors Anago; its FDD is already on a 2026 fiscal year, signaling a more forward-looking, growth-oriented system, while 76 Fence’s 2025 filing suggests a

home_services
Anago Franchising
home_services
76 Fence
Total units
45
2
Franchised units
44
1
Unit growth YoY
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$3.45M
$1.54M
Royalty
5%
8%
Ad fund
2.2%
1%
Initial franchise fee
$98K
$60K
Investment range (low)
$219K
$166K
Investment range (high)
$339K
$316K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
Franchisor controlled
FDD fiscal year
2026
2025
Filing freshness
CURRENT
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

Anago Franchising vs 76 Fence, answered

Anago Franchising has 45 total units and 76 Fence has 2, so Anago Franchising is the larger system.
Anago Franchising reports $3.45M in average unit revenue and 76 Fence reports $1.54M, so Anago Franchising has the higher AUV.
Anago Franchising charges a 5% royalty and 76 Fence charges 8%, so Anago Franchising has the lower royalty.
Anago Franchising's initial franchise fee is $98K and 76 Fence's is $60K, so 76 Fence has the lower fee.
Anago Franchising's initial investment runs $219K–$339K and 76 Fence's runs $166K–$316K, so Anago Franchising requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.