AEFC, INC. vs The UPS Store

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
The UPS Store
wins 5 of 12 vendor rows

The UPS Store is the stronger play, and it’s not particularly close. Budget is the lock-in factor here. At $724K AUV, a single location generates over 10× the top-line revenue of an AEFC unit. Even after The UPS Store’s 5% royalty and 1% ad fund, operators have real operating cash flow to fund POS, scheduling, and marketing automation tools. AEFC’s $68K AUV means franchisees are scraping by; software spend will be a rounding error they fight tooth and nail to avoid. Total addressable market seals it—5,487 franchised locations versus 107. You can lose 95% of UPS Store deals and still book 274 units. The procurement model difference is real, but it’s a speed bump, not a wall. Approved-supplier means you have to register and price transparently, but you can still sell directly to franchisees who have actual money.

The one meaningful tradeoff is unit growth momentum versus staying power. AEFC’s 5.9% growth clip is nearly 2.3× The UPS Store’s 2.6%, and they’re clearly in expansion mode. That’s timing working in your favor—new units need full tech stacks, no rip-and-replace objection. But a fast-growing brand with $68K unit economics is a house of cards. One inflationary squeeze or supply-chain disruption and that growth flatlines, taking your pipeline with it. The UPS Store’s maturing network is boring, durable, and packed with operators who’ve been running cash-positive locations for a decade. Mature units don’t just buy software; they upgrade it, integrate it, and pay support fees on it for years.

Terrain makes the UPS Store proposition even cleaner. A 2026 FDD filed current means their franchise disclosure data is fresh and reliable; you’re not underwriting deals on stale unit counts or outdated investment ranges. AEFC’s FDD is marked DUE, which means you’re prospecting into a black box—legal risk if their Item 19 changes materially, and wasted SDR effort if unit counts shift post-filing. When you sell into franchises, the quality of the data you build territories on is half the battle, and AEFC’s is decaying by the day.

Verdict: Sell into The UPS Store now for budget depth, massive TAM, and clean terrain; monitor AEFC only after they file a current FDD and prove unit economics can hit $100K+ AUV.

retail_non_food
AEFC, INC.
retail_non_food
The UPS Store
Total units
109
5,503
Franchised units
107
5,487
Unit growth YoY
5.941%
2.561%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$68K
$724K
Royalty
5%
5%
Ad fund
1.5%
1%
Initial franchise fee
$30K
$40K
Investment range (low)
$170K
$160K
Investment range (high)
$365K
$606K
Procurement model
Franchisor controlled
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2025
2026
Filing freshness
DUE
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

AEFC, INC. vs The UPS Store, answered

AEFC, INC. has 109 total units and The UPS Store has 5,503, so The UPS Store is the larger system.
AEFC, INC. grew units +5.941% year over year vs +2.561% for The UPS Store, so AEFC, INC. is growing faster.
AEFC, INC. reports $68K in average unit revenue and The UPS Store reports $724K, so The UPS Store has the higher AUV.
Both charge a 5% royalty.
AEFC, INC.'s initial franchise fee is $30K and The UPS Store's is $40K, so AEFC, INC. has the lower fee.
AEFC, INC.'s initial investment runs $170K–$365K and The UPS Store's runs $160K–$606K, so The UPS Store requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.