A&W Restaurants vs Papa Murphy's

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
Papa Murphy's
wins 2 of 12 vendor rows

A&W’s 407 franchised units generate an average $1.3M in revenue, and the high end of its investment range hits $1.64M. That signals franchisees with real capital and a willingness to spend on operations—exactly the kind of buyer who can justify a multi-module POS, scheduling, and marketing automation stack. Papa Murphy’s lower investment band ($450K–$693K) and absence of a disclosed AUV suggest thinner margins and less discretionary budget per location, which directly caps deal size and lengthens sales cycles.

Total addressable market clearly tilts toward Papa Murphy’s 965 franchised units, nearly 2.4× A&W’s

quick_service_restaurant
A&W Restaurants
quick_service_restaurant
Papa Murphy's
Total units
409
1,014
Franchised units
407
965
Unit growth YoY
-3.596%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$1.30M
Royalty
5%
5%
Ad fund
5%
2%
Initial franchise fee
$30K
$25K
Investment range (low)
$894K
$450K
Investment range (high)
$1.64M
$693K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2026
2026
Filing freshness
CURRENT
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

A&W Restaurants vs Papa Murphy's, answered

A&W Restaurants has 409 total units and Papa Murphy's has 1,014, so Papa Murphy's is the larger system.
Both charge a 5% royalty.
A&W Restaurants's initial franchise fee is $30K and Papa Murphy's's is $25K, so Papa Murphy's has the lower fee.
A&W Restaurants's initial investment runs $894K–$1.64M and Papa Murphy's's runs $450K–$693K, so A&W Restaurants requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.