SIGN GYPSIES vs HealthSource Chiropractic

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
SIGN GYPSIES
wins 2 of 12 vendor rows

SIGN GYPSIES brings a 4x unit count advantage, but that raw TAM is hollow. The investment range tells the real story: $4,150–$9,900 per unit means the average deal size is tiny—likely $6,000 or less in franchisee wallet share. Selling a $500/month platform into 565 units nets far less total contract value than HealthSource’s 129 locations, even if every dollar lands stickier. The vendor wins on terrain, not volume.

HealthSource Chiropractic counters with significantly richer unit economics and an open procurement model. A $609k AUV per location creates real software budget, and the 7% royalty funds a healthy recurring stream. Their approved-supplier structure means franchisees can buy any compatible solution, not just the one the franchisor forces. That’s the decisive wedge: SIGN GY

personal_services
SIGN GYPSIES
personal_services
HealthSource Chiropractic
Total units
565
129
Franchised units
565
129
Unit growth YoY
-9.744%
-2.273%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$610K
Royalty
7%
Ad fund
0%
2%
Initial franchise fee
$60K
Investment range (low)
$4K
$101K
Investment range (high)
$10K
$630K
Procurement model
Franchisor controlled
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2026
2026
Filing freshness
CURRENT
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

SIGN GYPSIES vs HealthSource Chiropractic, answered

SIGN GYPSIES has 565 total units and HealthSource Chiropractic has 129, so SIGN GYPSIES is the larger system.
SIGN GYPSIES grew units -9.744% year over year vs -2.273% for HealthSource Chiropractic, so HealthSource Chiropractic is growing faster.
SIGN GYPSIES's initial investment runs $4K–$10K and HealthSource Chiropractic's runs $101K–$630K, so HealthSource Chiropractic requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.