Rolling Suds Franchising vs 76 Fence
Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.
More open target
Rolling Suds Franchising
wins 3 of 12 vendor rows
Rolling Suds Franchising is the far stronger software-sales opportunity right now, and the gap isn’t close. The dimension that dominates is TAM. With 134 franchised units on a current FDD, you have an actual addressable base that can generate recurring revenue at scale. 76 Fence’s $1.54M AUV signals a single franchisee with a deep budget, but a one-unit “target” is a consulting gig, not a scalable software pipeline. Even if
home_services
Rolling Suds Franchising
home_services
76 Fence
Total units
135
2
Franchised units
134
1
Unit growth YoY
—
—
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$447K
$1.54M
Royalty
8%
8%
Ad fund
2%
1%
Initial franchise fee
$55K
$60K
Investment range (low)
$211K
$166K
Investment range (high)
$299K
$316K
Procurement model
Franchisor controlled
Franchisor controlled
FDD fiscal year
2026
2025
Filing freshness
CURRENT
DUE
Common questions
Rolling Suds Franchising vs 76 Fence, answered
Rolling Suds Franchising has 135 total units and 76 Fence has 2, so Rolling Suds Franchising is the larger system.
Rolling Suds Franchising reports $447K in average unit revenue and 76 Fence reports $1.54M, so 76 Fence has the higher AUV.
Both charge a 8% royalty.
Rolling Suds Franchising's initial franchise fee is $55K and 76 Fence's is $60K, so Rolling Suds Franchising has the lower fee.
Rolling Suds Franchising's initial investment runs $211K–$299K and 76 Fence's runs $166K–$316K, so Rolling Suds Franchising requires the larger investment.
See this comparison scored to your product.
The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.