Chip City vs Papa Murphy's
Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.
Papa Murphy’s wins on TAM by a landslide. With 965 franchised units, the addressable base is over 20x larger than Chip City’s 44 corporate locations. For a software vendor, that translates into a pipeline of independent operators who control their own tech stack, versus a single, centralized buyer. Even a modest attach rate across Papa Murphy’s franchisees delivers more deals than a clean sweep of Chip City. The sheer volume of potential accounts makes it the stronger near-term revenue play.
The tradeoff is budget and trajectory. Chip City’s $729K AUV signals healthier per-unit spend, and as a young, all-corporate brand it may be priming for a franchise launch—a classic greenfield opportunity. But that upside is speculative, and 44 units won’t sustain a dedicated sales effort. Papa Murphy’s -3.6% unit decline is a real drag, yet the installed base is deep enough to absorb churn and still generate substantial pipeline. Per-unit software budgets may be leaner, but aggregate TAM more than compensates.
Terrain and timing are neutral: both use an approved-supplier model and file current FDDs. The decision comes down to scale versus potential. Right now, scale pays the bills.
Verdict: Papa Murphy’s is the stronger immediate software-sales opportunity because its massive franchised TAM outweighs negative unit growth and lower per-unit budget signals.
Common questions
Chip City vs Papa Murphy's, answered
See this comparison scored to your product.
The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.