BidExecs vs ActionCOACH
Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.
More open target
ActionCOACH
wins 3 of 12 vendor rows
[Wafer: response was truncated before the model finished its internal reasoning. Increase max_tokens, or disable thinking on this model (e.g. chat_template_kwargs.enable_thinking=false), then retry.]
professional_services
BidExecs
professional_services
ActionCOACH
Total units
7
128
Franchised units
6
128
Unit growth YoY
100%
—
Average unit revenue (AUV)
—
$236K
Royalty
10%
15%
Ad fund
4%
5%
Initial franchise fee
$35K
$45K
Investment range (low)
$58K
$221K
Investment range (high)
$86K
$489K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2023
2026
Filing freshness
OVERDUE
CURRENT
Common questions
BidExecs vs ActionCOACH, answered
BidExecs has 7 total units and ActionCOACH has 128, so ActionCOACH is the larger system.
BidExecs charges a 10% royalty and ActionCOACH charges 15%, so BidExecs has the lower royalty.
BidExecs's initial franchise fee is $35K and ActionCOACH's is $45K, so BidExecs has the lower fee.
BidExecs's initial investment runs $58K–$86K and ActionCOACH's runs $221K–$489K, so ActionCOACH requires the larger investment.
See this comparison scored to your product.
The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.