American Freight vs Aaron's and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
Aaron's and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership
wins 3 of 12 vendor rows

Aaron’s is the stronger software-sales opportunity right now because it wins on TAM and terrain—the dimensions that matter most for recurring revenue—while American Freight’s headline 400% unit growth collapses under scrutiny. Aaron’s delivers 224 franchised units (plus 938 corporate) against American Freight’s paltry 5 franchisees. That’s a 45:1 ratio of actual, billable franchise locations, and the fresh 2026 FDD confirms the franchisor is actively managing its network, not coasting on a dormant filing. The approved-supplier procurement model is a gatekeeper, not a dealbreaker: once you earn that designation, you lock out competitors and access every franchisee with a single integration effort. The flat unit growth is inconsequential when your immediate addressable base is already four times American Freight’s entire system.

American Freight’s timing story—400% year-over-year growth—is seductive but hollow. That surge likely represents a corporate expansion from a near-zero base, and it adds zero franchisees who would independently buy your software. The dormant 2023 FDD signals a franchisor that either isn’t prioritizing franchise sales or has paused them altogether, making the 5-unit franchise TAM a rounding error. Higher AUV and investment range hint at better per-unit budget, but with only five customers, you can’t build a sustainable pipeline. The “terrain” tradeoff is worth noting: American Freight’s procurement model is unstated and probably open, lowering initial friction, yet no amount of easy access compensates for a market that barely exists. Aaron’s makes you work for the listing, but the reward is a durable, protected slice of 1,162 units.

Verdict: Aaron’s large, stable unit base and moat-like approved-supplier list make it the superior near-term software target despite zero growth, because software ROI lives in install-base scale, not empty growth rates.

retail_non_food
American Freight
retail_non_food
Aaron's and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership
Total units
260
1,162
Franchised units
5
224
Unit growth YoY
400%
0%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$1.93M
Royalty
5%
6%
Ad fund
5%
5%
Initial franchise fee
$50K
$35K
Investment range (low)
$497K
$307K
Investment range (high)
$943K
$838K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
FDD fiscal year
2023
2026
Filing freshness
DORMANT
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

American Freight vs Aaron's and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership, answered

American Freight has 260 total units and Aaron's and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership has 1,162, so Aaron's and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership is the larger system.
American Freight grew units +400% year over year vs 0% for Aaron's and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership, so American Freight is growing faster.
American Freight charges a 5% royalty and Aaron's and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership charges 6%, so American Freight has the lower royalty.
American Freight's initial franchise fee is $50K and Aaron's and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership's is $35K, so Aaron's and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership has the lower fee.
American Freight's initial investment runs $497K–$943K and Aaron's and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership's runs $307K–$838K, so American Freight requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.