ACE DuraFlo vs 76 Fence

Two franchise systems, side by side. For a software vendor, they are not the same opportunity.

More open target
ACE DuraFlo
wins 3 of 12 vendor rows

76 Fence and ACE DuraFlo are evenly matched on the signals we track from their filings. Verdict: too close to call on the filings alone — pick based on your category fit.

home_services
ACE DuraFlo
home_services
76 Fence
Total units
11
2
Franchised units
10
1
Unit growth YoY
-9.091%
Average unit revenue (AUV)
$1.54M
Royalty
8%
8%
Ad fund
1.5%
1%
Initial franchise fee
$20K
$60K
Investment range (low)
$102K
$166K
Investment range (high)
$415K
$316K
Procurement model
Approved supplier
Franchisor controlled
FDD fiscal year
2022
2025
Filing freshness
DORMANT
CURRENT

Go deeper

Common questions

ACE DuraFlo vs 76 Fence, answered

ACE DuraFlo has 11 total units and 76 Fence has 2, so ACE DuraFlo is the larger system.
Both charge a 8% royalty.
ACE DuraFlo's initial franchise fee is $20K and 76 Fence's is $60K, so ACE DuraFlo has the lower fee.
ACE DuraFlo's initial investment runs $102K–$415K and 76 Fence's runs $166K–$316K, so ACE DuraFlo requires the larger investment.

See this comparison scored to your product.

The vendor edge changes depending on what you sell. Run your site and we’ll re-weight it.